Our first act of war was to not let the fact of being at war control us – like Flip Rogers said about the cop-in-the-head: “The rhetoric and irrationals of warfare are so ingrained in our culture and psychologies, that it would be too easy to succumb to some dumb need for violence, to cast the battle in terms of enemies, when what we’re fighting is precisely that mindset.”
So instead we spent the evening having a grand old time, nothing fancy, just sitting around the apartment toking up with Flip and Damien and Damien’s wolf-dog Tia (short for Larentia, the mother of Romulous and Remus, but who Damien calls Tilla after a Grateful Dead song when he’s trying to impress the hippy girls). Anyway, I’d never realized before how much simple pleasure there is in just hanging around other people, instead of feeling my usual tense alienation. “What can war do to us when we can feel this luxurious?” I asked, “And why is it so easy for the good times to fall apart?”
The other night Phoebe and I went out for Indian food at People’s, and she asked over garlic nan, “Do you view yourself in the first or third person?”
“Both, at all times,” I answered. But the more I think about it, I’m caught in a first person narration so objective and rationalized it makes think before you act seem too immediate, and a 99th person perspective a more accurate description.
It reminded me of the conversation I had with this fellow Tak the other day –who keeps interrupting my lunch breaks in front of the Coop to talk when I’m trying to read or write philosophical treaties.
I had a copy of the Romantic Manifesto open, which Tim P. and I’ve been discussing, and Tak just went off on Objectivism. “The problem with reason – like Capitalism and warfare – is that it views everything in terms of use: ideas, art, living beings, when there’s so many experiences and emotions that will never fit in a logical framework or plot structure. Reality is far too subjective to say what’s right. Take Pynchon for instance,” he said, “you’ve read Gravity’s Rainbow, right?”
I just shook my head, not willing to admit that each time I try, I shudder the tome shut when that screaming comes across the sky. I have no desire to read a war novel no matter how non-rational it might be, because war is never rational and I’m beginning to realize the purpose of existence – once collective and individual continuance have been taken care of – should be to enjoy this: to live in pleasurable harmony with ourselves and the universe.
Which despite sounding obvious is really quite a hard feat to master.
Because the violence and hatred and warfare blare at us constantly through the news and entertainment media like we’ve all got Slothrop’s erection when the bombs drop.
“What we need to do,” Flip said, “is find some other story to live in.”
I was leaning back in a dumpstered chair, petting Tia and puffing one of Flip’s fat blunts, feeling not just at ease but positively regal. Damien didn’t want to hear about my great mood, distraught over politics, zombies, and fighting with his mother (and the positive not making for a realistic narrative).
“So what about you,” I’d asked Flip, “do you live in the first or third person?”
To which he laughed, “I plead the second, I’m like a choose-your-own-adventure novel, you remember those? Each moment and option presented to me I ask myself, Flip Rogers, well now, what do you want to do?” Which explains what I find so odd and fascinating about his character – that rather than feeling trapped in someone else’s story he lives freely in his own.
He went on to explain how the Beats felt the same urge: “Not Kerouac, I’m talking Clellon-Holmes, whose book Go you need to read next, god, he was an outcast in their scene, witnessing the breakdown of Herbert Huncke, who screams fuck you six times at the climax, and that would make a pretty poignant chorus for this jazz tune I’m writing for The Moment. No no, you see, after JK’s football accident, at the end of WWII, he and Ginsburg realized they didn’t have a story for their own generation – because you can’t live by the old stories anymore – and they set out to make a new one, turning all the random encounters into fodder for their art, always asking, what now, and, and then? And then picking the most exciting alternative, so that decades later kids still emulate their frantic footprints, the whole bongos and finger snapping image thankfully faded out by now but you get the picture. The first punks did the same, they wrote their own stories in song. And that, my friends, is precisely what we have to do if we hope to be get beyond this dead end plot we’re trapped in. The best teacher is experience and not someone else’s distorted point of view. As Ursula LeGuin put it, to see that your life is a story while you’re in the middle of living it may help you live it well. Now who’s with me?”
(previous: 1.3.10) (next: 1.4.2)
A reply to Orwell’s infamous dystopia, 1984, 1Q84 tells the story of two characters who get sucked into an alternate version of the year 1984 in Tokyo – a world, as the novel puts it, with a question. Tengo is an aspiring novelist who ghostwrites a magical work of fiction written by a mysterious teenage girl, a work of fiction that increasingly becomes real. Aomame is a gym trainer who secretly avenges the deaths of abused women. Together they shake a religious cult to its foundations and seek each others’ love beneath the light of two moons.